Time and again, feminists have pointed out, quite clearly, that a woman who has imbibed any alcohol at all is incapable of providing consent to sexual activities. The laws which have been crafted in recent years reflect this and verify that women are, in fact, unable to make decisions under the influence of even the slightest amount of alcohol.
In fact, not only are women incapable of making decisions once they’re drunk, their capacity to even decide whether to be drunk or not in the first place is completely lacking! Indeed, were a woman to have so much as a man ask her if she’d like a drink, or offer to buy one for her, she’s socially obligated with such force that she’s absolutely required, and nearly forced at gunpoint, to consume that alcohol in the first place.
Men, on the other hand, are quite capable of retaining any and all decision making prowess while drunk, as alcohol uniquely affects women. This can be seen quite clearly in how the laws operate:
If a woman is drunk but a man is not, then she is incapable of providing consent, but he is fully able to provide consent.
If a male is drunk, but a female is not, then the male is able to provide consent without issue. In fact, if the male is so drunk that he has passed out unconscious from imbibing too much alcohol, that’s alright, even unconscious the male has enough mental capacity to consent to sexual intercourse, thereby making it impossible to rape a man while unconscious.
This is how it’s fully possible for both a male and female to be drunk, yet for the female to not be able to provide consent, yet it is possible for the male to provide consent.
With this in mind, it’s quite clear that women are simply not responsible for their actions while intoxicated. In fact, even the mere choice of becoming intoxicated in the first place is out of their hands entirely, and as such, the fact that we have the audacity to try to enforce responsibility on women in other areas while drunk is proof of misogyny!
Women are sometimes actually considered for being the designated driver, despite that they have absolutely zero capacity to choose whether they drink or not. Why, a woman can even be charged with drunk driving, when it’s clearly not her fault that she was drunk in the first place! Why would we ever even dare to consider filing charges against her? It’s not like it was her fault that several people died from her reckless driving. After all, she was drunk at the time, so it’s not like she was responsible for her actions. Being able to consent to driving while drunk is an impossibility, so really, it should be the car manufacturer’s fault.
To help with this problem we should enforce that all car manufacturers install breathalyzers into their cars that must be blown into before the car will start. After all, in the current design, the car is providing consent to be driven whether a woman’s drunk or not, and the woman is incapable of providing this same level of consent, so the onus is upon the car itself to prevent her from driving.
Of course, this doesn’t fix the problem that the woman may still have been forced into drinking in the first place by asking her if she’d like a drink. Even sober, feminists and the legal system are quite adamant that no woman has the mental capacity to honestly be able to say “no” to a drink, nor to consider the implications of what she may do while intoxicated.
In order to better protect women from the harms associated with predators who actually try to give women free drinks, it’s in women’s best interests for us to ban women from drinking at all.
Not only should women not be allowed to have alcohol sold to them, but there should be penalties and fines in place for men who even so much as ask a woman if she’d like a drink, and far harsher penalties if anyone actually tries to buy a woman a drink. After all, adult women have even less capacity to make decisions for themselves when it comes to alcohol than underaged children do.
For example, children in France can be expected to drink responsibly as young as 14 years of age, and 14 years of age is also coincidentally the age at which a male is capable of providing consent to have sex with a 34 year old woman, to the point of having to pay child support, despite not being legally able to even hold a job yet.
Yep, it’s pretty obvious that, even as fully grown adults, women are incapable of drinking responsibly, even including the decision to drink at all in the first place, and as such, women should not be allowed even so much as the opportunity to be abused like this.
Of course, it’s also quite clear that, since women can’t make decisions while sober, such as the decision on whether to get drunk or not in the first place, it’s quite unfair that we actually require them to make decisions on much of anything.
Even things like choosing which career field they want to pursue is quite difficult, as women are still pressured into choosing only low-paying jobs, despite positions being held open for them in many fields. Why, paying half their tuition for their education still isn’t good enough, and it’s quite obvious to anyone that women are so socially pressured that they still try to go into things like interior design, or fashion design, despite that there are almost no jobs available and the pay for such is mediocre in most cases.
As such, we must also recognize that this misogyny must be combated as well. As women are under such pressure that they can’t make a decision on their careers on their own, we should honestly start making those decisions for them with proper quotas set up. If a woman tries to go to college, or even attempts to work without a college degree, she should be legally forced to accept a free course in electrical engineering, or particle physics, regardless of her capacity to actually perform that career path adequately, or her desire to pursue such.
It’s been made quite clear that women have no capacity to make decisions for themselves, and despite that positions in management are all about making decisions, we really do need more women in management. As such, we’ll simply have to double the number of management positions out there. Men who go into management will have to make all the decisions, while women will be allowed to play in the plastic ball pool with the slide that will now be mandatory to be installed in all office buildings.
Of course, the fact that women will be making money for doing literally nothing of value is problematic, so we’re going to have to ensure that these positions are enforced legally and their pay subsidized 100% by the government.
As math is hard, and decisions are impossible for women, men will have to bare the full burden of paying any money that doesn’t go towards their alimony or child support payments as taxes to fund the wages for women.
Has anyone else gotten pissed off at how foolish this entire argument is so far? That every single paragraph is an exercise in misogyny and absurdity taken to even greater levels as each new argument is introduced?
Because this is what feminists want for women. This isn’t a better, equal future for women, it’s nonsense and bloody ridiculous. Women are more than capable of making decisions for themselves, and quite able to handle these challenges. If we allow feminism to keep spouting that women are useless, retarded infants with terminal brain damage, this is the path we will eventually see provided.
Own up, accept responsibility for your actions, and claim your true power – the power to decide what YOU want, rather than being told what you want.
Feminism has provided the arguments for this entire rant, and hopefully, in this absurd light, some of us can finally realize just how ridiculous feminism’s claims of women are.
We’re better than that. We’re smarter than that. We’re more responsible and capable than that. Don’t let feminism portray us as less than we are just so they can have more freebies without working for them at the cost of your dignity and self-respect. It’s just not worth it.
A bit about the Author:
She is a writer, a video game writer, an animator, transgendered, Lithuanian, female, bisexual, and, interestingly enough, legally blind without her glasses. And none of that matters. What matters is she’s passionate about men’s and others’ human rights.